![]() ![]() Neither is the original trilogy "spoiled" by the prequels, nor do the originals make revelations about the prequels, at least as far as possible. And this way it might even be better at highlighting the "mirroring games that George Lucas was playing in the prequels" as described in Richard's answer.įrom a "spoiler" viewpoint of discovering the story unbenknownst to its outcome, it might actually be the best order. While it is similar in its intent of giving a kind of flashback, as the order provided in Nobby's answer (or the "Machete Order" derived from that), it drives this even further and spreads the flashbacks a bit more. But this is an order that provides the most variety between old and new (from the few reasonable orders at least). Decide for yourself if that is a good thing or not. It provides a nice varying mixture of originals and prequels. While many people don't like the prequels that much compared to the original trilogy, we're not here to debate about the individual movies' quality, but to watch Star Wars! And while the reasoning about I's story-wise irrelevance that is behind "Machete Order" is not that untrue, I for myself would not regard an order that leaves out a film from the official live-action movie series a complete viewing. It includes all the live-action films of the official Star Wars movie series, which has always been at the core of the whole Star Wars franchise. Now I can't personally speak about the impressions of a "newcomer" or if it's the "best" order possible, but it certainly has its advantages and is at least worth mentioning. I recently rewatched it in the order IV, (I, II), V, (III), VI (prequels bracketed for clarity), which I first saw proposed in this related answer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |